USPTO serial 85926945
GOLDEN GUJARAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDEN GUJARAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Soula Skokos
SOULA SKOKOS SKOKOS LAW GROUP, LLC1100 JORIE BLVD STE 220OAK BROOK, IL 60523-4421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Indian nut-based snack foods; Roasted rice flakes; Fried rice flakes; Fried lentil mixes; fried lentil based snack foods; Nut-based snack foods; Low calorie savory Indian nut based snack foods; low calorie Indian nut based snack foods; Processed nuts; spicy peanuts; hot spicy flavored peanuts; spicy peanuts flavored with masala spices; Processed green gram beans; Mini fig and date roll consisting of dried fruits, nuts, and spices; Banana chips; salty banana chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Rice-based snack foods; saffron mango pulp; jaggery; Gram flour chips and flour crisps; Spicy gram flour fried noodles; spicy gram flour fried snack food; puffed rice snacks; peanut based snack foods; fried lentil based snack foods; gram flour spicy based snack foods; fried Corn flakes; Multigrain-based snack foods; Baked pastries with savory filling; dried Colocasia leaves based snack foods; crunchy thick noodles; Fenugreek flavored crunchy noodles; Fried flour crisps; spicy fried thick noodles; Low calorie savory Indian multigrain-based snack foods; low calorie Indian multigrain-based snack foods; Low calorie savory Indian nut based snack foods; low calorie Indian nut based snack foods spicy corn mixes; mix of rice flakes and fried flour crisps; Savory rice based snack mixes; savory rice based snack food; spices; puffed rice; Snack mix of puffed rice, spices, dried fruit, nuts and lemon; Fried flour strands in the nature of chips; extra thin fried flour strands in the nature of chips; spicy extra thin fried flour strands in the nature of chips; flour balls filled with bean stuffing with spices; Mini bread rolls; Fried raw chickpeas; cumin chips; fenugreek chips; chickpea flour noodles mixed with spices; crispy flat bread chips; banana wafers; spicy banana wafers; sweet banana wafers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Everest Traders, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Everest Traders, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GOLDEN GUJARAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |