USPTO serial 85927170
COMBAT MERINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMBAT MERINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Epting
THOMAS W EPTING SMITH MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLPPO BOX 87GREENVILLE, SC 29602-0087UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SOCKS, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, UNDERWEAR, HEADWEAR, PULLOVERS, COATS, PANTS, JACKETS, INFANT WEAR, GLOVES, SWEATERS, SWEATER VESTS, UNDERGARMENTS, AND VESTS; CAMOUFLAGE GLOVES, CAMOUFLAGE JACKETS, CAMOUFLAGE PANTS, CAMOUFLAGE SHIRTS CAMOUFLAGE VESTS, ALL CONTAINING MERINO WOOL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |