Drawing for CAMBRIDGE SELECT

USPTO serial 85927526

CAMBRIDGE SELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAMBRIDGE SELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSHUA S. JARVIS

JOSHUA S. JARVIS FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVD STE 1600BOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for consumer product research, pricing, order creation and tracking, account and inventory management and reconciliation, inventory risk management and forecasting, analyzing and predicting customer demand, analyzing and predicting availability, popularity and pricing of consumer goods, and analyzing and predicting purchasing and sales trends, all related to on-line retail store servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 3, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 3, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 13, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance