USPTO serial 85927909
VINIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pina M. Campagna
PINA M CAMPAGNA CARTER DELUCA FARRELL & SCHMIDT LLP445 BROADHOLLOW RD STE 420MELVILLE, NY 11747-3685UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Drug delivery agents in the form of capsules that provide controlled release of the active ingredients for a wide variety of pharmaceuticals; Medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Medicinal creams for skin care; Nutritional supplements in the form of capsules, tablets, caplets, syrups, sachets, gummies and gels; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplemental drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beverages; vitamin enriched water | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Cheese; Jellies and jams; Shakes; Yogurt; nut and seed based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bagels; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a tea base; Bread; Breakfast cereals; candies; sweets; cereal bars; granola based snack bars; chewing gum; chocolate; confections, namely, frozen confections, chocolate confections, frozen yogurt confections; crackers; snack foods, namely, cereal based snack foods, rice based snack foods, chocolate based snack foods, corn based snack foods; frozen yogurt; all of the forgoing goods containing plant polyphenols and none comprising licorice, licorice-type candies, licorice confectionery or licorice-type confectionery | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Coconut water; energy drinks; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy shots; smoothies; soft drinks; Bottled water beverages, namely, coconut water and flavored water; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, namely, fruit drinks and fruit juices, mixed fruit juices, grape juice beverages and vegetable-fruit juice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bio Harvest Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Fruitura Bioscience Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Fruitura Bioscience Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named VINIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |