Drawing for STAX

USPTO serial 85928452

STAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal E. Friedman

NEAL E. FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD, P.L.L.C.112 PLEASANT STCONCORD, NH 03301-2931UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services; business information services provided on-line from a computer database or the internet; business networking services; online data processing services; compilation and systemisation of information into computer databases; database management services; information and advisory services relating to all of the aforesaidACTIVE—
038Providing access to electronic communications networks and electronic databases; services for the electronic transmission of documents; electronic data exchange services; chat room services for social networking; information and advisory services relating to all of the aforesaidACTIVE—
039Computerized data storage, namely, electronic storage of data for othersACTIVE—
045Internet-based social networking services; online social networking services in the field of civil engineering and the contracting, building and construction industries/communitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance