Drawing for FLASH VIRTUALIZATION PLATFORM

USPTO serial 85928613

FLASH VIRTUALIZATION PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLASH VIRTUALIZATION PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. James

MARK B. JAMES WHITE SUMMERS CAFFEE & JAMES, LLP805 SW BROADWAY STE 2440PORTLAND, OR 97205-3317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enhancing storage related performance in virtualized computing environments; Computer software for enhancing storage related performance in virtualized computing environments that may be downloaded from a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 12, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 11, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2013LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 5, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance