USPTO serial 85928910
COMPAREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4744166Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2015
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPAREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce B. Klemmer
JOYCE B. KLEMMER SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1230 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Planning, namely, scheduling of data technology installations and consultancy with regard thereto; data processing services; retail, wholesale and resale store services and licensed distributorships featuring hardware and software for others; business administration and management of software licenses; outsourcing services in the nature of operating computer centers for others, namely, reserving and providing of computer center facilities for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2013 |
| 037 | Maintenance of database system hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2013 |
| 042 | Computing centers, namely, electronic data storage services, cloud computing featuring software for use in electronic storage of data, database management, and hosting of website and software applications of others; design and development of computer centers; design of computer centers and consultancy with regard thereto; computer center system analysis and optimization; design of computer center architectures; design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software for computer center systems; data migration in the field of computer centers, namely, data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; technical computer project management in the field of computer centers; technical advisory and computer technology support services, namely, help desk services in the field of hardware and software and computer centers; consultancy in the field of computer hardware and computer software; telephone-based computer hardware and software consultancy in the event of failures and application problems; software implementation; leasing and rental of computers, computer center components and computer software other than mainframe software and software and software other than mainframe software licenses; planning of IT infrastructure systems comprising hardware and software, installation and maintenance of IT infrastructure software and consultancy with regard thereto; design of computer networks, installation and maintenance of computer network software; integration of hardware and software other than mainframe software from different manufacturers; analysis and design of computer networks and client-server installations for others; computer programming other than mainframe software; design of computer networks; design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software other than mainframe software; data migration, namely, data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; development, operation and maintenance of database system software; technical computer project management in the field of electronic data processing; services in the field of information and communications technologies, namely, computer systems analysis and technical data analysis services; operating computer infrastructure networks in the field of information and communications technologies; providing non-downloadable software other than mainframe software, namely, software for computer network software administration, software asset management, audit, recordkeeping software for licensee compliance, desktop publishing software application, computer network software for administration of computer local area networks, setting up and configuring wide area networks, cloud computer software for electronic storage of data, anti-virus software, operating system office tools software accessible via the internet; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site administration and management of software other than mainframe software licenses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2013 |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software other than mainframe software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAREX Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAREX Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAREX Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named COMPAREX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 26, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |