USPTO serial 85929137
NUVIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5317305Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2017
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NUVIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin F. Lynch
1620 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 550SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Head-up Displays (HUD) for use on motorcycles, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information; Head-up Display Systems (HUD Systems) for use on motorcycles, comprising HUD, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information, and built in or external hardware, namely, visors in the nature of head-mounted video displays and motorcycle goggles, for generating data to be displayed on HUD; Head-mounted Displays (HMD) for use on motorcycles, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information; Head-mounted Display Systems (HMD Systems) for use on motorcycles, comprising HMD, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information, and built in or external hardware, namely, visors in the nature of head-mounted video displays and motorcycle goggles, for generating data to be displayed on HMD; Helmet-mounted Displays (HmountD) for use in motorcycle riding, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information; Helmet-mounted Display Systems (HmountD Systems) for use in motorcycle riding, comprising HmountD, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information, and built in or external hardware, namely, visors in the nature of head-mounted video displays and motorcycle goggles, for generating data to be displayed on Helmet-mounted Display; Near-to-Eye Displays (NTE) for use in motorcycle riding, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information; Near-to-Eye Display Systems (NTE Display Systems) for use in motorcycle riding, comprising NTE Display, namely, fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for providing motorcycle riders with navigational and operational information, and built in or external hardware, namely, visors in the nature of head-mounted video displays and motorcycle goggles, for generating data to be displayed on NTE Display; Accessories to HUD, HUD Systems, HMD, HMD Systems, HmountD, HmountD Systems, NTE Displays, NTE Display Systems, namely, mounting systems comprising mounting racks for HUD; cases and housings specially adapted for HUD, HUD Systems, HMD, HMD Systems, HmountD, HmountD Systems, NTE Displays, and NTE Display Systems; remote controller for head-up displays; battery packs; power cables; Software applications, namely, computer and mobile, application software for displaying, processing, filtering, sharing or manipulating data generated from HUD, HUD Systems, HMD, HMD Systems, HmountD, HmountD Systems, NTE Displays, NTE Display Systems; computer software applications for smartphones and mobile phones for adding applications in the nature of integrating smartphone and mobile phone applications to HUD, HUD Systems, HMD, HMD Systems, HmountD, HmountD Systems, NTE Displays, NTE Display Systems and for storing, sharing or displaying data from HUD, HUD Systems, HMD, HMD Systems, HmountD, HmountD Systems, NTE Displays, NTE Display Systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 3, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |