Drawing for BLONDE INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 85929229

BLONDE INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLONDE INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian A. Hall

Brian A. Hall Traverse Legal PLC810 Cottageview Drive, Unit G-20Traverse City, MI 49684UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Machines for use in the hairdressing industry, namely, automated battery-operated and electrically-powered appliances that straightens, curls and blow dries hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance