Drawing for LA SENZA SHOW OFF

USPTO serial 85929994

LA SENZA SHOW OFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA SENZA SHOW OFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stella M. Brown

KEVIN C PARKS LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body cream; Body lotion; Body sprays; Body wash; Eau de toilette; Fragrances for personal use; PerfumeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 16, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 14, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 14, 2017EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Aug 13, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 20, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 20, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 22, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance