USPTO serial 85930589
SMART FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
JUSTIN R YOUNG DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606-1633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Gymnastic instruction; Providing facilities for sports tournaments; Providing gymnastic facilities; Providing sports facilities; Providing various facilities for an array of sporting events, sports and athletic competitions and awards programmes; Sport camps; Sports training services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |