USPTO serial 85930879
BELLA DOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLA DOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 N CAPITOL ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric kitchen appliances, namely, electric food and beverage kitchen mixers, electric food blenders, electric ice shaving machines, electric coffee grinders, electric milk frothers, milking machines, frozen drink making machines, Electric egg beaters, Electric food slicers, Electric food processors, Electric juice extractors, Electric juicers, Electric knives, Electric can openers, Electric food grinders, Electric food choppers, electric fruit and vegetable peelers, Electric pasta makers for domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric grills, electric griddles, electric sandwich makers, electric waffle makers, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, electric coffee makers, electric espresso machines, donut makers in the nature of deep frying machines, Electric food dehydrators, Bread-making machines, electric boilers, Electric roasters, electronic cupcake making machines, Electric rice cookers and steamers, Electric indoor grills, gas grills, electric food warmers, Grill accessories in the nature of warming trays, Electric kettles, Deep frying machines, convection oven, Electric slow cookers, Electric cookware in the nature of broilers and roasters, Microwave ovens, Cotton candy making machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cooking utensils in the nature of spatulas, turners and ladles; non-electric cooking tools, namely, slotted spoons, turners, ladles, spatulas, cooking tools holder, vegetable mashers, flour sifters, graters for household purposes, fruit and vegetable presses, whisks, scoops, separators for separating fat from gravy, bowls, colanders, cutting boards, bakeware, rolling pins, cookie cutters, baking molds, basters, fat skimmers, garlic presses, dough scrapers, dough blenders, melon ballers, pie servers, ice cream scoops, spaghetti claw-servers, splatter screens for kitchen use, basting brushes, pastry brushes, sifters and jar openers, bottle openers, potato ricer, potato mashers, cake servers; Barbecue tools, namely, forks, tongs and non-electric turners; Beverage glassware, cups and mugs, plates and dishes; non-electric cookware, namely, pots and pans, roasting pans and steamers; kits for making cakes comprising cake molds, cake pans, cake tins, and cake stands; Containers for household or kitchen use; Hydration devices, namely, double wall cups and water bottles sold empty; plastic, stainless steel and aluminum water bottles sold empty; tea and food infusers; mugs and cups | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Kitchen linens, towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Topping syrup; Baking spices; Edible cake decorations; cookies; Cotton candy mixes; Ice cream mixes; pastries; pastry snacks; popcorn; popcorn kits comprising unpopped popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sensio Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BELLA DOTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |