USPTO serial 85931961
ULTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2016
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Naples, FL
Naples, FL
Naples, FL
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SAN JOSE, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 310NAPLES, FL 34103-3586UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Active electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, quartz crystals, microprocessor crystals, crystal filters, phased locked loops, frequency translators, frequency generating devices and frequency controlling devices; crystal clock oscillators; oscillators; temperature compensated crystal oscillators; voltage controlled crystal oscillators; oven controlled crystal oscillators; ceramic resonators; voltage controlled oscillators; application specific integrated circuits; integrated circuits; programmable integrated circuits; integrated circuit modules; BAW (bulk acoustic wave) resonators; BAW oscillators; SAW (surface acoustic wave) resonators; SAW oscillators; semiconductor chips; semiconductor chips engineered to produce frequencies without mechanical movement or mechanical resonation; crystal free oscillators; and software for running, programming and controlling active electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, quartz crystals, microprocessor crystals, crystal filters, phased locked loops, frequency translators, frequency generating devices and frequency controlling devices, crystal clock oscillators, oscillators, temperature compensated crystal oscillators, voltage controlled crystal oscillators, oven controlled crystal oscillators, ceramic resonators, voltage controlled oscillators, application specific integrated circuits, integrated circuits, programmable integrated circuits, integrated circuit modules, BAW (bulk acoustic wave) resonators, BAW oscillators, SAW (surface acoustic wave) resonators, SAW oscillators, semiconductor chips, semiconductor chips engineered to produce frequencies without mechanical movement or mechanical resonation and crystal free oscillators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2013 |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of Active electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, quartz crystals, microprocessor crystals, crystal filters, phased locked loops, frequency translators, frequency generating devices and frequency controlling devices; crystal clock oscillators; oscillators; temperature compensated crystal oscillators; voltage controlled crystal oscillators; oven controlled crystal oscillators; ceramic resonators; voltage controlled oscillators; application specific integrated circuits; integrated circuits; programmable integrated circuits; integrated circuit modules; BAW (bulk acoustic wave) resonators; BAW oscillators; SAW (surface acoustic wave) resonators; SAW oscillators; semiconductor chips; semiconductor chips engineered to produce frequencies without mechanical movement or mechanical resonation; crystal free oscillators; providing information on active electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, quartz crystals, microprocessor crystals, crystal filters, phased locked loops, frequency translators, frequency generating devices and frequency controlling devices, crystal clock oscillators, oscillators, temperature compensated crystal oscillators, voltage controlled crystal oscillators, oven controlled crystal oscillators, ceramic resonators, voltage controlled oscillators, application specific integrated circuits, integrated circuits, programmable integrated circuits, integrated circuit modules, BAW (bulk acoustic wave) resonators, BAW oscillators, SAW (surface acoustic wave) resonators and SAW oscillators via a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fox Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fox Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fox Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ULTRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 18, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |