Drawing for MAXXUS

USPTO serial 85932153

MAXXUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXXUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Dalton

MICHAEL J. DALTON DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP1999 HARRISON ST FL 25OAKLAND, CA 94612-3520UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Spas in the nature of heated poolsACTIVEOct 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Aug 6, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 5, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 7, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 24, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance