Drawing for SERVICETOWN

USPTO serial 85932651

SERVICETOWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, ELIZABETH FLEMING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVICETOWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

DAVID A.W. WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing an online marketplace for sellers of goods and/or services; providing a website featuring the ratings, reviews and recommendations on products and services for commercial purposes posted by users; providing a website featuring evaluative feedback in the field of rating sellers' goods and services, the value and prices of sellers' goods and services, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall experience in connection therewith; providing a website featuring appointment scheduling services; providing an online commercial information directory; providing an online searchable database in the field of business information and business contacts; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods and services, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods and services from an Internet website, particularly specializing in the marketing of the sale of goods and services of othersACTIVE
042providing a web hosting platform for an online marketplace for sellers of goods and/or services; providing a web hosting platform for users to post ratings, reviews and recommendations on products and services for commercial purposes; providing a web hosting platform for users to leave evaluative feedback in the field of rating sellers' goods and services, the value and prices of sellers' goods and services, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall experience in connection therewith; providing a web hosting platform for appointment scheduling servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 24, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 24, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 20, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 25, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 31, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 25, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 4, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 4, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 14, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 10, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 10, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
May 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 18, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance