USPTO serial 85932926
WILFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DONALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Christopher
JOHN CHRISTOPHER CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A.200 E LAS OLAS BLVD STE 2040FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-2240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric kitchen machines and utensils, namely, machines for beating, mixing and blending of foodstuffs and attachments for the aforesaid machines, sold as a unit or separately, for chopping, carving, slicing, cutting, sifting and filtering of foodstuffs, for juice extraction and for kneading; electric household appliances, namely, blenders, coffee mills, can openers, mixers, whisks, electric knives, electric whisks, food processors, pasta-making machines, bread cutting machines, juicers, hand mixer and stick blenders, electric vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner hoses, vacuum cleaner bags, vacuum pumps | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2013 |
| 008 | Electric and non-electric hair clippers for personal use; electric and non-electric razors; electric irons | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2013 |
| 009 | Bathroom scales; room thermometers and outdoor thermometers; climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, air conditioning, heating, ventilation and drying control devices; electronic automated beverage dispensing machines, not heated or cooled | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2013 |
| 021 | Electric toothbrushes; coffee filters not of paper being part of non-electric coffee makers | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AS WILFA
- Other trademarks owned by AS WILFA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named WILFA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |