USPTO serial 85933130
BRAINBUDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAINBUDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon P. Deppe
JON P. DEPPE MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP8055 E TUFTS AVE STE 450DENVER, CO 80237-2837UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Acoustic coupling apparatus for use with the ear, namely, headsets, headphones, and earphones; Computer application software for mobile phones and smart devices, namely, software for use in brain health and wellness solutions for medical treatment and diagnosis purposes; Computer software for manipulating digital audio information for use in audio media applications; Computer software for creating and editing music and sounds; Computer software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices; Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; Downloadable cloud computer software for brain health and wellness solutions for medical treatment and diagnosis purposes; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for brain health and wellness solutions for medical treatment and diagnosis purposes; Acoustic coupling apparatus for use with the ear in the nature of headsets, headphones, and earplugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electromedical rehabilitative and pain management products for clinical and home use, namely, electrical nerve and muscle stimulators and laser therapy stimulators; Electronic stimulator for nerves, brain, cells, and ears for medical and phyiscal therapy purposes; Apparatus for the therapeutic stimulation of the body; Therapy instruments and apparatus, namely, apparatus for pulsed current stimulation therapy; Electrical stimulation apparatus and instruments for medical use; Electro-medical apparatus for therapy; Electro-medical current stimulation apparatus; Apparatus for nerve stimulation; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation electrodes; Sound wave therapy apparatus; Static electric therapy apparatus; Electromagnetic wave apparatus for use in therapy; Low frequency electric and electromagnetic therapy apparatus; High frequency electric and electromagnetic therapy apparatus; Ultrasonic therapy stimulators and apparatus; Apparatus for magnet therapy and magnet therapy stimulators; Medical apparatus and instruments relating to neurovegetative reactivity; Apparatus for the stimulation of acupuncture points; Medical apparatus for analysing brain wave frequencies; Ear inserts or mountings for medical use; Medical apparatus and instruments using rhythms and sound for stimulation; Medical apparatus, namely, implantable ports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE THINKER AG
- Other trademarks owned by BRAINIQUE AG
- Other trademarks owned by BRAINIQUE AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BRAINBUDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |