USPTO serial 85933434
I. MAGNIN & COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2020
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with I. MAGNIN & COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA, US
Newport Coast, CA, US
Newport Coast, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin Ashurov
Benjamin Ashurov KB ASH LAW GROUP PC2603 Camino RamonSuite 200San Ramon, CA 94566Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mobile retail store services featuring clothing, shoes and general merchandise; On-line retail department store services; On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; On-line retail store services featuring physical and virtual merchandise for use by members of an online community in connection with a designated website featuring fictional characters; On-line retail store services featuring clothing, shoes and general merchandise; Retail apparel stores; Retail department store services; Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others | ACTIVE | May 16, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |