Drawing for THINK GREEN

USPTO serial 85934001

THINK GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GALAN, MATTHEW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben D. Tobor

BEN D TOBOR GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP1000 LOUISIANA ST STE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016garbage bags of plastic; recycling bags of paper; paper bags for recyclingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 2, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 2, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2015EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Oct 27, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 27, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 3, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 3, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 3, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance