USPTO serial 85934273
WILDER & SONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2015
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WILDER & SONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace Han Stanton
GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THECLYMB
- Other trademarks owned by Retail Innovation Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Retail Innovation Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WILDER & SONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Jun 9, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Jun 9, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| May 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 8, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | โ |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Sep 29, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Sep 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Sep 25, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Sep 25, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | โ |
| Sep 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | โ |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | โ |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | โ |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jul 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| May 29, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | โ |
| May 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| May 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |