USPTO serial 85934314
QUACK!MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUACK!MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Taylor
CHRISTOPHER M. TAYLOR HOOPER HATHAWAY, P.C.126 S MAIN STANN ARBOR, MI 48104-1945UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films and downloadable motion picture films featuring live action, music, music groups, and/or animation; Downloadable video recordings, namely, recordings of motion picture films featuring live action, music, music groups, and/or animation; music prerecorded on CDs; prerecorded music downloadable through digital and electronic file formats | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising agency services; interactive and digital media advertising; marketing communications services, namely, providing customized communication programs to help businesses and governmental agencies promote and market their products and services; business marketing consulting in the field of brand creation, brand development, brand identity and brand marketing; sales promotion services; media consulting services, namely, planning, buying and negotiating advertising and media space and time for others; Post-production editing services for video and audio commercials; Advertisement and publicity services by television, internet, radio, and mail; Advertisement and publicity services by television, internet, radio, and mail; Production of film, Internet, and television advertising; Production of television and Internet commercials; Providing advertising, marketing and promotional services, namely, development of advertising campaigns provided through television, internet, webcasts, radio broadcasts, newspapers, magazines, online banners, outdoor billboards | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and film; Production of videos for the Internet; Production of sound and music video recordings; Video production services; Film and video production; Entertainment media production services for motion pictures, television, and Internet; Entertainment, namely, production of television programs and Internet videos; Production of television programs and Internet videos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |