USPTO serial 85934543
WEBNX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5456036Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2018
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WEBNX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keesonga Gore
NATHANIEL KELLY LAW OFFICES OF NATE KELLY9107 WILSHIRE BLVDSUITE 450BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer network servers; Computer servers for managing data centers, games, and network infrastructure applications; Computer storage devices, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; Internet servers,, namely, web servers, Intranet servers; Network access server hardware for providing Internet access, access to data centers, and access to network infrastructure applications; Network access server operating software for providing Internet access, access to data centers, and access to network infrastructure applications; all of the aforementioned goods excluding virtual servers, and software, hardware, and servers for VoIP, multimedia teleconferencing, web conferencing, videoconferencing, online collaboration, meetings, and messaging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 035 | Telecommunications network management services, namely, the operation and administration of telecommunication systems and networks,, namely, data centers, for others, all of the aforementioned services excluding virtual servers, VoIP, multimedia teleconferencing, web conferencing, videoconferencing, online collaboration, meeting, and messaging services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 038 | Leasing of telecommunication equipment, excluding video and web conferencing equipment; Leasing of telecommunication equipment, namely, servers; Rental of equipment for telecommunications; Rental of telecommunication equipment; Rental of telecommunication equipment servers; Rental of telecommunication facilities, namely, co-location facilities for containerized data centers of others; all of the aforementioned services excluding virtual servers, VoIP, multimedia teleconferencing, web conferencing, videoconferencing, online collaboration, meeting, and messaging services, and excluding deployment using X-Window protocol and/or proxy systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of others; Computer services, namely, providing web servers, file servers, co-location servers, load balancing servers, redundancy servers, and database servers of variable capacity to third party computing and data storage facilities; Developing and hosting a server on a global computer network for the purpose of facilitating e-commerce via such a server; Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Providing a website featuring technology that enables subscribers to transfer files to and from a file transfer protocol server; Rental of a database server to third parties; Rental of web servers; Server hosting, namely, hosting datacenter servers, game servers, and network infrastructure servers; Technical support services, namely, 24/7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; all of the aforementioned services excluding virtual servers, VoIP, multimedia teleconferencing, web conferencing, videoconferencing, online collaboration, meeting, and messaging services, and excluding deployment using X-Window protocol and/or proxy systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WebNX
- Other trademarks owned by WebNX
- Other trademarks owned by WebNX
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WEBNX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |