Drawing for THE LASSY PROJECT

USPTO serial 85935182

THE LASSY PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LASSY PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL M. CISLO

DANIEL M. CISLO Cislo & Thomas, LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Tracking system comprising encoded electronic chip cards, computer hardware and software for use with cell phones and GPS enabled devicesACTIVE—
035Tracking, locating and monitoring of vehicles, maritime vessels and aircraft services for commercial purposes featuring a tracking system for use with cell phones and GPS enabled devicesACTIVE—
045Tracking, locating and monitoring services for recovering lost animals featuring a tracking system for use with cell phones and GPS enabled devices; Tracking services for retrieval of encoded products that have been lost or stolen featuring a tracking system for use with cell phones and GPS enabled devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2014ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 27, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance