USPTO serial 85935579
K12 INSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with K12 INSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing data collection for public schools, school districts, counties and communities for business purposes, namely, collection, compilation, data processing, and provision of business information, data, statistics, and indices for public schools, school districts, counties and communities; analysis of public opinion surveys for public schools, school districts, counties and communities; consulting services in the fields of public opinion survey analysis and strategy for public schools, school districts, counties and communities; consulting services in the field of education administration; providing survey design and business research services relating to public opinion surveys; stakeholder survey consulting services in the field of education, namely, consulting on the design and use of stakeholder surveys to assist public schools and school districts in communicating with parents, teachers, students, community members and other stakeholder groups | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 2006 |
| 042 | Design and development of online software for others for use in administering surveys over a computer network; design and development of online computer software for others for use in collecting survey data; design and development of online computer software for others for use in enterprise feedback management and community response management for others; Providing use of on-line proprietary, non-downloadable software for customer creation, customization, modification, updating, collection, maintenance, analysis and reporting of on-line single- or multi-page surveys, questionnaires, and other data collection formats, and for publishing, exporting, emailing, printing, and transferring surveys and survey results, reports, analysis; technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting of computer software problems and website application usage problems to users in connection with the creation, modification, updating, collection, maintenance, analysis, reporting and transfer of on-line single- and multi-page surveys, questionnaires and other data collection formats utilizing a website and proprietary non-downloadable on-line software; technical support services, namely, administration and troubleshooting of on-line software and applications | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |