USPTO serial 85937185
SDM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SDM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Joseph Schaeff
B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLPSUITE 1300 FIFTH THIRD CENTERONE SOUTH MAIN STREETDAYTON, OH 45402-2024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | product consulting services for the retail store industry, namely, consulting services with respect to the use of retail store product displays, demonstrations and promotions to enhance sales, the foregoing excluding consulting services relating to security; consulting services, namely, providing retail store owners and operators with comparisons of their store set-up, in-store marketing activities and sales with those of competitors, the foregoing excluding consulting services relating to security; consulting services, namely, providing reports regarding retail consumer shopping habits, retail store traffic flow and the influence of product display and placement on retail store purchases, the foregoing excluding consulting services relating to security; statistical evaluations of marketing data, namely, analysis of marketing reports, statistics and surveys respecting retail store traffic flow, retail consumer shopping habits, and the influence of product display and placement on retail store purchases, the foregoing excluding consulting services relating to security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARLOW-HRK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Harlow - HRK Sales & Marketing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Harlow - HRK Sales & Marketing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SDM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |