USPTO serial 85937420
JJW JJ.WHITE HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JJW JJ.WHITE HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cohen
MICHAEL A. COHEN SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C.1211 SW 5TH AVE STE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97204-3715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Pet beds, namely, beds for household pets; living room furniture; bedroom furniture; garden furniture; beds; mattresses and mattress foundations; mattress toppers; insert cushions; pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Home and bathroom textiles, namely, bath towels, bath linen, duvets, bed blankets, bed sheets, bed pads, drapes, namely, draperies | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Home and bathroom textiles, namely, bath mats, bath rugs, rugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring home textiles, bathroom textiles, bed room textiles, pet beds, living room furniture, bed room furniture, garden furniture, beds, mattresses and mattress foundations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Novo Holdings Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named JJW JJ.WHITE HOME
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |