USPTO serial 85937839
CITRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for virtualization, networking, collaboration, remote access, remote support, cloud computing, mobile device management, data sharing, data security, access, administration and management of computer applications and computer hardware, computer application distribution, and for transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video, and information, and for content management, online project management, online conferences, meetings, demonstrations, tours, presentations and interactive discussions | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications and information technology services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video, and information via telephone and global communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training and education services, namely, training in the field of computer systems, networks, computer software and hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service services, namely, hosting software for virtualization, networking, collaboration, remote access, remote support, cloud computing, mobile device management, data sharing, data security, access, administration and management of computer applications and computer hardware, computer application distribution, and for transmission voice, data, images, audio, video, and information, and for content management, online project management, online conferences, meetings, demonstrations, tours, presentations and interactive discussions; technical consultation in the field of computer systems, networks and software; technical assistance in the nature of monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; providing technical information in the field of computer systems, networks and software; integration of computer systems, networks and software; installation, maintenance, and updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Citrix Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Citrix Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CITRIX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |