USPTO serial 85938036
GROUPOFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROUPOFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3527UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded video tapes, cassettes, DVDs, and CDs, featuring exercise, fitness and dietary information and instruction, and instructional materials distributed in connection therewith and sold as a unit; downloadable audio clips, video clips, musical recordings, musical videos, film clips, photographs, and other multimedia files in the field of exercise and nutrition | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Providing a web site featuring on-line instruction in the field of physical exercise and nutrition and tracking progress of workouts; educational services and on-line educational services, namely, providing instruction in the fields of exercise equipment, physical exercise and nutrition, and distribution of instructional materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, providing instruction in the field of tracking progress of workouts for others; entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; education and entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, other multimedia materials, and information all in the field of exercise; online journals, namely, blogs featuring information in the field of exercise, fitness, dietary information and instruction; educational services, namely, providing web-based, classroom and other training in the field of exercise equipment, physical fitness, diet and nutritional programs for certification of instructors and continuing education for instructors and distribution of training material in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, and field trips in the field of exercise equipment, diet and nutritional programs, and sales techniques and distribution of training material in connection therewith; membership club services, namely, providing training to members in the field of exercise equipment, diet and nutritional programs, and sales techniques; educational services, namely, offering of assessments and surveys in the field of educator training and performance for the purpose of improving teaching procedures; physical fitness training services and consultancy; providing information in the field of exercise training | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |