USPTO serial 85938210
CLEARVOYANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEARVOYANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Altos Hills, CA
Los Altos Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren S. Heit
27753 SHERLOCK RDLOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022-6319UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | GLASS SCREEN CLEANERS, GLASS CLEANERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF PROVERBS, SAYINGS, QUOTES AND FORTUNES; CALENDARS; MEMO PADS; NOTE PADS; BOOKMARKS; AND GREETING CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | TEE SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, JACKETS, PANTS, SHORTS, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, HATS AND CAPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clearvoyant LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Clearvoyant LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CLEARVOYANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |