Drawing for METABOX

USPTO serial 85938582

METABOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METABOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Parker Gates

LISA PARKER GATES BAKER & MCKENZIE, LLP300 E RANDOLPH ST STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-5014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Hosting of digital content on the Internet, namely, hosting content, data, documents, files, information and multimedia content of any kind for others on the Internet and other computer and communication networks, in particular on a website; providing a website featuring technology that enables computer users to access, update, manipulate, modify, organize, store, back up, synchronize, transmit and share content, data, documents, files, information and multimedia content and hyperlinks via the Internet and other computer and communication networks, in particular on a websiteACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 2, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 15, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 24, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 27, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 14, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 24, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance