USPTO serial 85939485
PIVCHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIVCHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Brucker, Esq.
WILLIAM J. BRUCKER, ESQ. STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in validating and authenticating a Personal Identity Verification card, a Transportation Worker Identity Credential or other government issued identity card; Computer software for use in copying the information from a government issued identify card and importing it into a physical access control security system | ACTIVE | Dec 28, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |