USPTO serial 85939487
YOUNITED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUIGLEY, LINDA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUNITED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Starshak
KATHRYN STARSHAK K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use on desktops, laptops, servers, mobile devices, and networks and designed to work over the Internet and cloud computing for use as security, on-line storage, content sharing and backup | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission and retrieval of data, images, audio, video and documents, including text, electronic messages, and electronic mail, over local or global communications networks, including the internet, intranets, extranets, television, mobile networks, cellular and satellite networks; telecommunications services for providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; communications by computer terminals; communication between computer terminals; streaming of audio and video materials and files via global computer network; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; electronic mail services; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing, implementing and updating software solutions, namely, on-line storage, content sharing, backup and anti-theft for desktops, laptops, servers, network and Internet use security; Designing, implementing and updating provisioning, billing and customer communications systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for on-line storage, content sharing, backup and anti-theft for desktops, laptops, servers, network and Internet use security; Providing websites featuring technology that enable users to access stored data, images, audio, video and documents in the field of security; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; cloud computing featuring software for use in streaming, content sharing, content aggregation, content synchronization, storing secure notes; Computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the user to publish and share their own content and images on-line | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |