Drawing for CM FLOORING

USPTO serial 85939757

CM FLOORING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CM FLOORING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Robinson

Michael E. Robinson ROBINSON IP LAW, PLLC9724 Kin9724 Kingston Pike, Suite 1403Knoxville, TN 37922

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027CarpetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 8, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 4, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 7, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance