Drawing for PRODERM

USPTO serial 85940426

PRODERM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRODERM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Catalano

FRANK J CATALANO GABLEGOTWALS100 W 5TH ST FL 10TULSA, OK 74103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010gloves for medical and dental useACTIVEJan 17, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 17, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 17, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 27, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 3, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 30, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 31, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 31, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance