USPTO serial 85941395
CROSSFLO GROUP OF COMPANIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROSSFLO GROUP OF COMPANIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Livingston, TX
Livingston, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raman N. Dewan
RAMAN N. DEWAN JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.100 CONGRESS AVE STE 1100AUSTIN, TX 78701-4042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the areas of oil and gas production; business management services in the field of oil and gas production | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, investment consultation and management services in the field of oil and gas production, and investing funds for others in the field of oil and gas production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Ontic Group
- Other trademarks owned by The Ontic Group
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CROSSFLO GROUP OF COMPANIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |