USPTO serial 85941913
SELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
STACEY R. HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbags, traveling bags, briefcases, leather briefcases, leather credit card holders, wallets, leather document briefcases, leather key cases, purses, trunks, suit cases, cosmetic bags sold empty, sports bags included in this class, bags for athletic equipment, evening and shoulder bags for ladies, leather shopping bags, school bags, garment bags for travel, suit carriers for travel, shoe bags for travel, beach bags, diaper bags, backpacks, Boston bags, traveling trunks, duffel bags, overnight bags, carry-on bags, bags for mountain-climbing, satchels, opera bags, vanity cases (not fitted), hides, cases and boxes made of leather, bags made of leather for packaging, leather straps, umbrellas, leather leashes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Leather coats, leather jackets, leather trousers, leather skirts, leather tops, leather raincoats, leather long coats, leather overcoats, leather belts, leather braces for clothing, belts, suits, padded jackets, jackets, stuff jackets, jumpers, trousers, jeans, skirts, dresses, coats, overcoats, cloaks, raincoats, parkas, pullovers, shirts, T-shirts, blouses, sweaters, underwear, baby-dolls being nightwear, bathrobes, bathing costumes, negligee, swim suits, dressing gowns, nightgowns, one-piece dresses, two-piece dresses, evening dresses, shawls, scarves, ties, neckties, gentlemen suits, dress shirts, aloha shirts, sweat shirts, under shirts, polo shirts, body suits, blazers, shorts, sport shirts; shoes, athletic shoes, slippers, overshoes, low heel shoes, leather shoes, rubber shoes, galoshes, golf shoes, wooden clog, angler shoes, basketball shoes, dress shoes, heels, hiking shoes, rugby shoes, boxing shoes, base ball shoes, lacquered shoes, beach shoes, inner soes, soles for footwear, footwear upper, heelpieces for shoes and boots, non-slipping pieces for shoes and boots, tips for footwear, rain shoes, track-racing shoes, work shoes, straw shoes, gymnastic shoes, boots, ski boots, half boots, arctic boots, football boots, laced boots, field hockey shoes, hand ball shoes, esparto shoes or sandals, sandals, bath sandals; gloves, gloves for protection against cold, leather gloves, mittens; hats and caps, visor (headgear), leather hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |