USPTO serial 85942498
LUMENEXSTUDIO.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUMENEXSTUDIO.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlingame, CA
Hayward, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Omair M. Farooqui
OMAIR M. FAROOQUI ELLAHIE & FAROOQUI LLP12 S 1ST ST STE 600SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | All in the field of photography: Bags for cameras and photographic equipment; Bags specially adapted for underwater camera housings; Battery packs; Battery packs for cameras; DSLR (digital single lens reflex) camera rigs comprised of handles, follow focus and lens belt; Video camera rigs comprised of a follow focus with handles and lens belt; CFL (compact fluorescent lighting) photography light bulbs; Video slider gear, namely, camera panning slider; CFL (compact fluorescent lighting) photo lighting kit comprised of softbox, light stand, flash bulbs and photo umbrellas; Video camera tripods; and Digital on camera LED lights; Lightning arrester equipment; Camcorder handles; Camera cases; Camera filters; Camera handles; Camera mounts and supports; Camera stability accessory, namely, a support arm, vest and sled for film and video cameras to absorb shaking moves while shooting; Camera tripods; Cameras shutters; Cases for photographic apparatus; Collapsible light directors and diffusers for use with photographic lighting equipment for professional and high-end photography; Digital photo frames; Electrical lights for use in professional quality photography; Film cameras; Flash lamps; Flash Lamps for cameras; Flashlights for use in photography; Lens filters; Light directors and photographic lighting tents, all for use with photographic lighting equipment for professional and high-end photography; Light emitting diodes (LEDs); Lighting control apparatus; Lighting devices for taking pictures; Lights for use on video cameras; Lights for use with professional and personal cameras; Mounting devices for cameras and monitors; Photographic flashbulbs; Photography darkroom lamps; Photography drying racks; Portable photography equipment, namely, reflectors, tripods, light stands and supports and bags specially adapted for these goods; Shutters; Solar recharging battery pack for digital cameras; Stands for photographic apparatus; Tripods for cameras; All of the foregoing for use in the field of photography | ACTIVE | May 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |