USPTO serial 85943802
ONIRO PAPADOPOULOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5047599Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2016
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONIRO PAPADOPOULOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
JOHN W. MCGLYNN RATNERPRESTIA2200 Renaissance BoulevardSuite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | All kinds of biscuits, wafers, toast, crackers, chocolates, snacks, flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastries, pastry products, cakes, pastries, ice cream, candies, chewing gum, flour for dough, namely, flour, flour for foods, maize flakes, brines for cooking, bread, buns, pastries, waffles, malt cookies, milk chocolate, cocoa and coffee beverages with milk, frozen yogurt rice cakes, sweets, water ice, processed cereal, breakfast cereal, edible ices, yeasts, sugar, sugar dates, confectionery, candy, pasta, yeast extracts, dough, cocoa, candies mints, artificial coffee, coffee, cakes, crackers, pastry cream, thickeners for whipped cream, crepes, salt, macaroni, almond paste, honey, rice based snacks, dessert mousse, chocolate mousse, muesli, muesli bars, cereal bars, biscuits, rolled oats, noodles, iced tea, ice cream, sugared nuts, pies, pizzas, dessert puddings, pralines, ravioli, rice, tapioca, sago, processed wheat, chocolate, chocolate based beverages, spaghetti, tacos, tarts, pancakes, tortilla, breadcrumbs, tea, iced tea, tea based beverages, chewing gum, toast, wheat germ for human consumption, halva, brioche | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E. J. PAPADOPOULOS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by E. J. PAPADOPOULOS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by E. J. PAPADOPOULOS S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ONIRO PAPADOPOULOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2019 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |