USPTO serial 85943844
AGROPUR INGREDIENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5969943Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2020
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AGROPUR INGREDIENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
Mark I. Peroff Lerner David LLP20 Commerce DriveCranford, NJ 07016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | dough conditioners; wheat gluten for the food industry; food stabilizers for use in the manufacture of foods; flow agents for shredded cheese, namely, milk powder protein based additive to prevent mold and prevent clumping for food manufacturing purposes, custom made dairy based blends for food and feed industry for food manufacturing purposes; whey proteins for food manufacturing purposes; food additives in the nature of lecithin for non-nutritional food manufacturing purposes for use as ingredients; dairy based ingredients for food and feed manufacturing purposes namely whey permeate, dairy product solids, sweet whey powder, delactose whey powder, whey phospholipids, lactose, whey protein concentrate, whey protein isolates; mixes for bakery goods for food manufacturing purposes, namely, powder bread bases, powder dough bases, powder donut mixes, powder cake mixes, muffin mixes, powder mixes for bakery goods including bread mixes, brownie mixes, cake mixes, cookie mixes, icing mixes, mixes for making bakery batters, mixes for making breading; gluten-free dry blend bases for the bakery industry for food manufacturing purposes; dairy based and non-dairy based blends for the confection industry for food manufacturing purposes; parve-based dry blends for food manufacturing purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Cheese powders, milk powders, cultured dairy powders, including yogurt powders, sweet cream powder, sour cream powder, non-dairy creamers, dairy-based powders for making dairy-based food, beverages and shakes, bases for making soup; non-dairy based mix for making whipped toppings; dairy substitutes for baked goods, namely, whey, dry whey, and non-fat dried milk for food; egg substitutes for baked goods; dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; proteins for use as a food additive, namely, milk proteins, evaporated milk, and milk powder, all of the foregoing for food purposes; proteins for use as a food filler, namely, caseins, caseinates, soy proteins, and wheat proteins, all of the foregoing for food purposes; cultured buttermilk powders; yogurt powders; dairy-based beverage blends; soups | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | soy flour; grain-based snack foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Agropur Cooperative
- Other trademarks owned by Agropur Cooperative
- Other trademarks owned by Agropur Cooperative
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AGROPUR INGREDIENTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |