USPTO serial 85944753
COSPACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COSPACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Kindel
Christopher M. Kindel Pirkey Barber PLLC600 Congress Avenue Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the operation and management of web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; computer software for enabling, managing and delivering multi-location video conferencing; computer software for interconnecting, integrating, securing, managing, monitoring, and operating video conferencing systems; computer software, namely, software for identity detection used to identify participants in video conferencing, web conferencing or teleconferencing; computer software that facilitates multi-party video conferencing; software to enable users to search and locate information and people, communicate, collaborate, and share computer screens, desktops, data, electronic documents and applications, the aforesaid software being integrated with web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; application software for smartphones and tablet computers, namely, application software for the operation and management of web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; none of the aforesaid being related to augmented reality technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Web-conferencing services that allow users to share files, audio, video and presentations; network conferencing services that utilise or integrate computers, laptop computers, notebook computers, tablet computers, smartphones, mobile phones, cell phones, webcams, pagers, personal digital assistants, or internal and global computer networks; telecommunications services, namely, real time exchange of audio, video and data accessible during an audio and video teleconference exchange; telecommunication services, namely, providing web-based multimedia teleconferencing, telepresence conferencing, network conferencing and videoconferencing services, that allow simultaneous viewing, sharing, editing, and discussion of documents, data, video and images by participants via the Internet ; all of the aforesaid services being for or being related to web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; none of the aforesaid being related to augmented reality technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer technical support services, namely, help desk services, for videoconferencing, teleconferencing, and web-conferencing solutions, and for computer software that facilitates multi-party video conferencing and content sharing, diagnosing problems with video conferencing systems, and providing online reports regarding the performance, effectiveness, and status of web-based teleconferences and videoconferences; research, design and development of computer software for the operation and management of web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for conducting online conferences, meetings, demonstrations, presentations and interactive discussions; maintenance and upgrading of computer software for the operation and management of web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; application service provider (ASP) featuring software that enables users to view, share, manage and edit documents, search and locate information and people, communicate, collaborate, share computer screens, desktops, data, electronic documents and applications, and view, edit, and share data and images locally or in geographically dispersed locations in the fields of web-based conferencing, audio conferencing, and video conferencing; all of the aforesaid services being for or being related to web conferences, video conferences, persistent digital meeting rooms, or electronic meeting rooms; none of the aforesaid being related to augmented reality technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |