Drawing for CASE HOTEL

USPTO serial 85945122

CASE HOTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASE HOTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Haus

Alan Haus Royse Law Firm, PC149 Commonwealth Drive, #1001Menlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotels; resort hotels; motels; providing temporary accommodations for travelers; travel agency services for the reservation of hotel accommodations; specialized hotel services rendered as part of a program for frequent hotel guests; restaurant, bar and cocktail lounge services; snack bar services; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; catering for the provision of food and beverages; providing conference, exhibition and meeting facilities; rental of meeting roomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance