Drawing for NEW DIMENSIONS OF PLAY

USPTO serial 85945276

NEW DIMENSIONS OF PLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW DIMENSIONS OF PLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Hetu

JENNIFER M. HETU HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that makes toys digitally interactive, including computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely, software that displays three-dimensional digital graphics associated with physical game pieces on a mobile device; downloadable computer programs that are used in connection with positional game piece figures and trading card games sold as a unit in the field of computer gamesACTIVE—
028trading card games featuring printed playing cards; toys that are digitally enhanced by use of computer software, namely, toy blocks, toy cubes, play balls, targets, drawing toys, toy figures, dolls, squeeze toys, stacking toys, toy projectiles in the nature of toy rockets, darts, and toy guns that shoot toy rockets and darts, musical toys, foam toys in the nature of blocks, cubes, and balls, playset buildings, toy building blocks, plastic and vinyl toy characters, toy construction sets, pull toys, push toys, mechanical toys, bendable toys, electronic action toys, punching toys, printing toys, flying saucer toys, toy robots, educational toys for teaching math, science, language, and cognitive thinking skills and principlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2014PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance