USPTO serial 85946266
AUDAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree Street NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing benchmark business consulting and information related to consumer engagement, and for use as a predictive tool for consumer behavior and associated health risks and potential health care costs in the healthcare industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing consumers with an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users, both individuals and groups of users through a social experience, to access, enter, track, and monitor health records; providing an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users, both individuals and groups of users through a social experience, to enter, access, track, monitor and generate health and medical information and reports; providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to access health and medical information and reports for improving the overall health of consumers, which includes an engagement score that is comprised of a consumer's activity level with respect to fitness, nutrition, wellbeing and preventive care and which also includes a customized lifestyle plan for consumers that recommends fitness, nutrition, wellbeing and preventive care practices based off an individuals' lifestyle, health data, and personal goals | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Providing an interactive website for providing health and medical information and reports; Providing health information; providing health information to individuals and groups of individuals to track, monitor and improve their health; providing health information related to consumer engagement, and for use as a predictive tool for consumer behavior and associated health risks and potential health care costs; providing health information to health care providers and employers to empower their members to better understand and manage their health | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Audax Health Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Audax Health Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named AUDAX
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 4, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 4, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |