USPTO serial 85947756
EVERFLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERFLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn A. Sullivan
LYNN A. SULLIVAN LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD.2 PRUDENTIAL PLAZA 180 N STETSON STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Nutrients for use in agriculture and for flower cultivars; growth nutrients for natural plants and flowers; preservatives for flowers; chemical preparations and nutrients for preservation and post-harvest treatment of cut flowers, flower bulbs, tree cut stems and Christmas trees; natural and artificial fertilizers; micro-nutrient preparations for the prevention of fungus and mold in plant, flowers and cut flowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | cleaning preparations for use on flower vases and flower containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | all purpose disinfectants; disinfectants for use in horticulture; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides; herbicides; bactericides, insecticides and parasiticides in cut flowers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Everflor Ecuador S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Everflor Ecuador S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EVERFLOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |