Drawing for CURRENTC

USPTO serial 85948032

CURRENTC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURRENTC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Nieds

CHRISTOPHER B LAY IPHORGAN LTD195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RDSTE 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1768

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software application that allows merchants to deliver coupons, rebates, discounts, vouchers, rewards and special offers directly to the mobile telecommunications devices of consumers; Computer software application that allows for hosting of loyalty card credentials on mobile telecommunication devices; Computer software application that enables consumers to digitally transfer coupons, rebates, discounts, vouchers, rewards and special offers from websites, emails or other digital medium directly to their mobile telecommunications devices for presentation to merchants; software application that allows for hosting of loyalty card credentials onto mobile telecommunication devices. software application that merchants can deploy to allow consumers to digitally transfer coupons, rebates, discounts, vouchers, rewards and special offers from websites, emails or other digital medium directly to their mobile telecommunications devices; all of the foregoing not relating to baseball or softball or to a baseball or softball team, league, mascot or stadiumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 14, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2015TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
May 7, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 7, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 17, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance