USPTO serial 85949167
RENEWABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RENEWABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Baum
JOHN C. BAUM OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-5408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS, NAMELY, CHEMICALS PRODUCED BY MICROORGANISMS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FUELS, FUEL ADDITIVES, LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES, SOAPS, CLEANSING MATERIALS, OIL-BASED PRODUCTS, PLASTICS AND POLYMERS, COATINGS, COSMETICS, NUTRACEUTICALS, FOOD, AND A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | FUELS; BIOFUELS, LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES; FOSSIL FUEL AND LUBRICANT SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY, BIO-BASED FUELS AND BIO-BASED LUBRICANTS PREPARED FROM OILS PRODUCED BY MICROORGANISMS; ALL PURPOSE OILS PRODUCED BY MICROORGANISMS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FUELS, FUEL ADDITIVES, LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES, SOAPS, CLEANSING MATERIALS, OIL-BASED PRODUCTS, PLASTICS AND POLYMERS, COATINGS, COSMETICS, NUTRACEUTICALS, FOOD, AND A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; CHEMICAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN OIL PRODUCTION BY MICROORGANISMS; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FOSSIL FUEL AND LUBRICANT SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY, FUELS, FUEL ADDITIVES, LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES, BIO-BASED FUELS AND BIO-BASED LUBRICANTS, AND IN THE FIELD OF BOTANICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETICS, NUTRACEUTICALS, FOOD, OIL-BASED PRODUCTS, PLASTICS AND POLYMERS, AND A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS; LABORATORY AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FOSSIL FUEL AND LUBRICANT SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY, FUELS, FUEL ADDITIVES, LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES, BIO-FUELS AND BIO-LUBRICANTS, AND IN THE FIELD OF BOTANICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETICS, NUTRACEUTICALS, FOOD, OIL-BASED PRODUCTS, PLASTICS AND POLYMERS, AND A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |