USPTO serial 85949229
CED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Cumbow
ROBERT C. CUMBOW GRAHAM & DUNN PC2801 ALASKAN WAY STE 300SEATTLE, WA 98121-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Assistance in management of business activities; Assistance with business management and planning; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, business organization, marketing and customer analysis; Business assistance, advisory and consulting services in the field of developing business strategies, enhancing customer experiences, improving business operations, executing business projects, launching new products and services, and enabling business success through technology capabilities; Business consultation and management regarding marketing activities and launching of new products; Business consulting services relating to the integration of the areas of business process technology, organizational learning, change management, and operational sustainability; Business management; Business management consultancy and advisory services; Business management consultancy as well as development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; Business management consultation; Business management consultation in the field of executive and leadership development; Business management consulting, strategic planning and business advisory services provided to telecommunications companies, high-tech industries, healthcare industries, financial service industries, and retail and travel industries; Business strategy development services; Consulting services in the area of sustainable business solutions; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Management and business consulting services in the field of business strategies relating to marketing, sales, product and services, IT, customer service and operations; project leadership; customer and patient experiences; strategy realization; solution architecture; operational efficiencies; product and service management relating to the marketing and launching; and project and portfolio management leadership | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |