Drawing for SIX SENSES

USPTO serial 85949895

SIX SENSES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIX SENSES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

DAVID V. RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC50 S. 16th StreetPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate management services; real estate services, namely, leasing and management for others of residential condominiumsACTIVE—
043Hotel services; resort lodging services; restaurant, bar and cocktail lounge services; provision of conference, exhibition and meeting facilities; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; making reservations and bookings for others for accommodations and meals at health spasACTIVE—
044Health spa services, namely, providing massage, facial and body treatment services, and cosmetic body care services; manicure and pedicure services; making reservations and bookings for others for beauty treatments at health spasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 26, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance