USPTO serial 85950979
EPATIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPATIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Hansen
STEVEN R. HANSEN HANSEN IP LAW PLLCPO BOX 300069WATERFORD, MI 48330-0069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Integrated medical examination systems comprising medical devices and computer software for information management for use in remote physical examination and assessment of patients, excluding the audiology field | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Pharmaceutical services, namely, processing online and telephone prescription orders in retail and central fill pharmacies; transportation management services, namely, planning and coordinating transportation of medical patients for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Emergency transportation coordination, namely, ambulance transport services; transport of persons, namely, transportation of medical patients to medical testing and treatment facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical consultations provided via phone, online chat, text messaging, or videoconferencing; monitoring telephone calls made from or on behalf of subscribers and notifying emergency facilities; consulting services in the field of medical care, namely, consultation regarding the selection of emergency medical care facility; medical services, namely, prescription of patient medical diagnostic testing by physicians located remotely from patients; healthcare services, namely, prescription of patient medical treatment by physician located remotely from patient; providing limited in-home personal medical services for individuals including picking up prescriptions that have been prescribed by a physician remotely located from the patient | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring telephone calls made from or on behalf of subscribers and notifying emergency facilities; emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, monitoring of medical devices by a remote monitoring center for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ross Medical Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named EPATIENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |