Drawing for CRYSTALCOAT

USPTO serial 85952211

CRYSTALCOAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DONALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTALCOAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H. SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE W PMB 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Waterproofing chemical compositionsACTIVEJan 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 16, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 17, 2014RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 17, 2014RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2014RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance